DYNF vs RECS: Differences, Returns & Fees
DYNF and RECS hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned +19.6% over the year. Net assets: $42.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $5.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF.
RECS costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.8 points; DYNF is 6.6 times larger.
| DYNF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $38.6bn | $5.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| Holdings in common | 37% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41.0% | 40.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and RECS hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
37% in common
On the same fields
DYNF and RECS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DYNF
DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 261 positions, with the top ten at 41.0%.
About RECS
RECS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 356 positions, with the top ten at 40.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or RECS?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +19.6% and RECS +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or RECS?
- RECS is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DYNF against RECS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-recs
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DYNF against RECS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-recs
[DYNF against RECS (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-recs)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.