DYNF vs MSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
DYNF and MSLC hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned +19.6% over the year. Net assets: $42.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $4.0bn on May 31, 2026 for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF.
DYNF costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points; DYNF is 5.5 times larger.
| DYNF | MSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025 | $15.4bn | $2.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +14.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 58% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41.0% | 34.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and MSLC hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
58% in common
On the same fields
DYNF and MSLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DYNF
DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 261 positions, with the top ten at 41.0%.
About MSLC
MSLC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,007 positions, with the top ten at 34.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or MSLC?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +19.6% and MSLC +14.3%.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or MSLC?
- DYNF is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DYNF against MSLC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-mslc
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DYNF against MSLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-mslc
[DYNF against MSLC (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-mslc)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.