DYNF vs FFLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
DYNF and FFLC hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned +19.6% over the year. Net assets: $42.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $1.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF.
DYNF costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; DYNF is far larger, $41.8bn against $1.2bn.
| DYNF | FFLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.38% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $41.8bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +15.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 37% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41.0% | 39.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and FFLC hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
37% in common
On the same fields
DYNF and FFLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DYNF
DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 261 positions, with the top ten at 41.0%.
About FFLC
FFLC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 83% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 115 positions, with the top ten at 39.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or FFLC?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +19.6% and FFLC +15.3%.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or FFLC?
- DYNF is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DYNF against FFLC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fflc
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DYNF against FFLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fflc
[DYNF against FFLC (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fflc)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.