FFLC vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

FFLC and SPYM hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets: $1.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF, and $178.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.

SPYM costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; SPYM is far larger, $173.6bn against $1.2bn.

FFLC vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FFLCSPYM
Expense ratio0.38%0.02%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$1.2bn$173.6bn
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+17.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Index ?
Holdings in common43%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.5%39.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+15.3%
FFLC total return, 1 year
+17.3%
SPYM total return, 1 year
0.38%
FFLC expense ratio
0.02%
SPYM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FFLC and SPYM hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

43% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FFLC SPYM
NVIDIA CORP 8.35% 8.33%
APPLE INC 4.18% 7.42%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.55% 3.72%
ALPHABET INC 7.10% 3.05%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.60% 5.79%
BROADCOM INC 2.48% 2.56%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.94% 2.37%
ELI LILLY and CO 1.67% 1.40%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.96% 1.03%
VISA INC 1.90% 0.95%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 0.75% 1.51%
MERCK and CO INC 0.61% 0.53%
Only in FFLC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 2.40%
SHELL PLC 1.21%
IMPERIAL OIL LTD 0.88%
BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC 0.85%
ALLISON TRANSMISSION HLDGS INC 0.67%
BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC 0.66%
SK HYNIX INC 0.60%
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57%
Only in SPYM
ALPHABET INC CL C 2.45%
TESLA INC 1.58%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 1.42%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 1.31%
WALMART INC 0.74%
ABBVIE INC 0.72%
MASTERCARD INC A 0.69%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 0.68%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +15.3% +17.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +17.3% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not available 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.02%
Already in the S&P 500 82.9% 99.8%
Holdings 115 506
Net assets, FFLC as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPYM as of Oct 8, 2026 $1.2bn $178.5bn
Former ticker none SPLG

FFLC and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FFLC

FFLC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 83% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 115 positions, with the top ten at 39.5%.

About SPYM

SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index ?. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 39.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FFLC or SPYM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FFLC returned +15.3% and SPYM +17.3%.
Which is cheaper, FFLC or SPYM?
SPYM is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FFLC and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 83% of FFLC and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FFLC against SPYM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fflc-vs-spym

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.