DIA vs MSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees

DIA and MSLC hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and MSLC returned +14.3% over the year. Net assets: $44.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust, and $4.0bn on May 31, 2026 for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF.

DIA costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; DIA is 13.9 times larger.

DIA vs MSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
DIAMSLC
Expense ratio0.16%0.39%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$39.0bn$2.8bn
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+14.3%
What it tracksDow Jones Industrial AverageNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common29%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.0%34.8%
Below its high4.6%, high on Aug 5, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+13.0%
DIA total return, 1 year
+14.3%
MSLC total return, 1 year
0.16%
DIA expense ratio
0.39%
MSLC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DIA and MSLC hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

29% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DIA MSLC
MICROSOFT CORP 6.06% 4.98%
APPLE INC 3.95% 4.87%
ALPHABET INC CL A 4.04% 3.45%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.95% 4.46%
NVIDIA CORP 2.67% 6.61%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 3.84% 1.37%
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 4.35% 1.23%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.33% 0.94%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.23% 0.57%
MERCK + CO. INC. 1.65% 0.56%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.30% 0.55%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 2.97% 0.53%
Only in DIA
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 2.40%
Only in MSLC
BROADCOM INC 2.87%
META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A 2.33%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.14%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.76%
TESLA INC 1.32%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.10%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 0.95%
ELI LILLY & CO 0.86%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DIA
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
MSLC
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +13.0% +14.3%
Expense ratio 0.16% 0.39%
Already in the S&P 500 97.3% 92.3%
Holdings 30 1007
Net assets, DIA as of Oct 8, 2026 and MSLC as of May 31, 2026 $44.4bn $4.0bn

DIA and MSLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DIA

DIA tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 30 positions, with the top ten at 55.0%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About MSLC

MSLC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,007 positions, with the top ten at 34.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DIA or MSLC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +13.0% and MSLC +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, DIA or MSLC?
DIA is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DIA and MSLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DIA and 92% of MSLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DIA against MSLC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dia-vs-mslc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.