Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DGRW vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DGRW returned +11.1% to SCHG's +6.8%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DGRW and SCHG

Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+11.1%
DGRW total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.28%
DGRW expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points.

DGRW vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDGRWSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+11.1%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.28%0.04%
Net assets, DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$16.6bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 31, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 699 weekly returns
DGRW SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +418.8% +696.2%
Annualized edge SCHG +13.0% +16.7%
Price return edge SCHG +299.2% +614.1%
Risk
Volatility edge DGRW 14.7% 18.7%
Max drawdown edge DGRW −29.8% −34.2%
Downside capture 92.1% 108.1%
Beta 0.89 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG (slight) 0.78 0.82
Sortino edge SCHG (slight) 1.11 1.22
Treynor 0.128 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.44 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.19 0.65
Information ratio −0.29 0.40
Tracking error 4.0% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: DGRW against VOO, May 31, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +696.2% to +418.8%. DGRW swung less: 14.7% to 18.7%. DGRW fell less at its worst: −29.8% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DGRW vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDGRWSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.8%+696.2%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.0%+16.7%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+299.2%+614.1%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.7%18.7%DGRWSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.3%12.5%DGRWLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−29.8%−34.2%DGRWDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture85.5%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.891.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.940.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.780.82SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.111.22SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.49SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.190.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.7% to +2.1%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.290.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error4.0%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 699 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and SCHG hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DGRW SCHG
NVIDIA CORP 7.94% 10.67%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.74% 7.52%
APPLE INC 3.86% 9.29%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.97% 2.51%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 3.50%
ALPHABET INC 2.31% 3.97%
ALPHABET INC 2.31% 3.16%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.53% 2.93%
VISA INC 1.41% 2.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92% 1.36%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.84% 1.61%
MASTERCARD INC 0.59% 1.83%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DGRW
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%
ORACLE CORP 2.34%
ABBVIE INC 2.07%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.80%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.71%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.59%
Only in SCHG
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Tesla Inc 2.37%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.37%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.65%
General Electric Co 1.35%
Netflix Inc 1.31%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.19%
GE Vernova Inc 0.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +11.1% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −2.6 pts vs VOO −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 96.7% 94.7%
Holdings 197 192
Net assets, DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $16.6bn $63.0bn

DGRW and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F8333DF7DF

DGRW and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. DGRW follows WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DGRW returned +11.1% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DGRW

DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +11.1% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DGRW against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.