Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GRNY vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GRNY returned +6.5% to SCHG's +6.8%; 34% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GRNY and SCHG
Net assets: $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.71 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.
| Measure | GRNY | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $4.3bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 34% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.5% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 101 weekly returnsGRNY returned more: +34.7% to +30.1%. GRNY and SCHG swung about the same: 19.6% and 19.4%. SCHG fell slightly less at its worst: −21.9% to −23.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GRNY | SCHG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +34.7% | +30.1% | GRNY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.6% | +14.5% | GRNY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +34.5% | +29.1% | GRNY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.6% | 19.4% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.5% | 12.5% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −23.1% | −21.9% | SCHG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.68 | 0.59 | GRNY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.05 | 0.91 | GRNY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.72 | 0.66 | GRNY (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 101 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and SCHG hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
34% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
GRNY and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. GRNY follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 34% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. GRNY holds 43 positions and SCHG holds 192.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GRNY
GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +6.5% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, GRNY or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.71 percentage points a year. That is about $71 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GRNY against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GRNY against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-schg
[GRNY against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.