Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to SCHG's +6.8%; 54% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and SCHG

Net assets: $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points.

IVV vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Net assets, IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$885.1bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common54%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 879 weekly returns
IVV SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +833.2% +1,156.7%
Annualized edge SCHG +14.1% +16.2%
Price return edge SCHG +586.5% +988.8%
Risk
Volatility edge IVV 16.1% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge IVV (slight) −31.8% −34.2%
Downside capture 99.7% 108.1%
Beta 0.99 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.81 0.82
Sortino edge SCHG (slight) 1.17 1.22
Treynor 0.081 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG (slight) 0.44 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.33 0.65
Information ratio 0.00 0.40
Tracking error 1.2% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IVV against SPY, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +1,156.7% to +833.2%. IVV swung less: 16.1% to 18.5%. IVV fell slightly less at its worst: −31.8% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IVV vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+833.2%+1,156.7%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.1%+16.2%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+586.5%+988.8%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.1%18.5%IVVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.1%12.5%IVVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−34.2%IVV (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.3%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.7%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.810.82TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.171.22SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.47SCHG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.330.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.5%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.000.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.2%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 879 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

54%

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SCHG hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

54% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IVV SCHG
NVIDIA 7.92% 10.67%
APPLE 7.61% 9.29%
MICROSOFT 5.93% 7.52%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73% 5.07%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83% 3.97%
BROADCOM INC 2.45% 3.50%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26% 3.16%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05% 2.51%
TESLA INC 1.73% 2.37%
ELI LILLY 1.54% 2.93%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.37% 2.37%
VISA CLASS A 1.03% 2.43%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IVV
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.57%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.52%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.34%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.11%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.97%
WALMART 0.80%
ABBVIE 0.76%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.70%
Only in SCHG
General Electric Co 1.35%
Snowflake Inc 0.44%
Equinix Inc 0.40%
Cloudflare Inc 0.38%
KKR & Co Inc 0.29%
Moody's Corp 0.29%
Marriott International Inc 0.29%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 0.28%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 94.7%
Holdings 505 192
Net assets, IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $885.1bn $63.0bn

IVV and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0BB981277E

IVV and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IVV returned +13.7% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.9 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 54% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCHG?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.