Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to SCHG's +6.8%; 52% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and SCHG
Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points.
| Measure | IWB | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $49.1bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 52% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SCHG hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
52% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWB follows Russell 1000 Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWB returned +13.1% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.3 points.
- Number of holdings. IWB holds 1,025 positions and SCHG holds 192.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schg
[IWB against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.