Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWB vs SCHG: how they differ
IWB and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWB | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 7.26% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| APPLE 6.73% | Apple Inc 9.84% |
| MICROSOFT 5.21% | Microsoft Corp 7.18% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.49% | Amazon.com Inc 5.68% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% | Alphabet Inc 4.76% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.40% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | Russell 1000 | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.7% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.8 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.9% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 945 | 193 |
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or SCHG?
- IWB charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWB and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against SCHG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-schg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources