Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to SCHG's +6.8%; 47% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and SCHG

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points.

CGGR vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.04%
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$25.9bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common47%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +91.6% +105.3%
Annualized edge SCHG +15.0% +16.7%
Price return edge SCHG +89.2% +100.9%
Risk
Volatility edge CGGR (slight) 20.4% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge SCHG (slight) −27.7% −27.1%
Downside capture 115.9% 108.1%
Beta 1.20 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG (slight) 0.58 0.64
Sortino edge SCHG 0.88 0.99
Treynor 0.098 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.54 0.62
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 0.65
Information ratio 0.18 0.40
Tracking error 6.7% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +105.3% to +91.6%. CGGR swung slightly less: 20.4% to 21.2%. SCHG fell slightly less at its worst: −27.1% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+105.3%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+16.7%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+100.9%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%21.2%CGGR (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%13.7%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−27.1%SCHG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.201.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.64SCHG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.99SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.62SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.370.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.180.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

47%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SCHG hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

47% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 10.67%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 7.52%
Broadcom Inc 4.69% 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.21% 3.97%
Alphabet Inc 3.06% 3.16%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38% 2.51%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48% 5.07%
Visa Inc 3.33% 2.43%
Tesla Inc 4.19% 2.37%
Apple Inc 2.29% 9.29%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11% 2.93%
General Electric Co 1.05% 1.35%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Shopify Inc 1.72%
Welltower Inc 1.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.39%
Intel Corp 1.08%
ASML Holding NV 1.01%
Amphenol Corp 0.94%
Only in SCHG
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.37%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.65%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.19%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.91%
Linde PLC 0.87%
Walt Disney Co 0.72%
Blackrock Inc 0.64%
Booking Holdings Inc 0.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 94.7%
Holdings 96 192
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $25.9bn $63.0bn

CGGR and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A92351E6EF

CGGR and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 47% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.