Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to QQQM's +15.2%; 43% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and QQQM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.6 points; QQQM is 4.3 times larger.

CGGR vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common43%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM +91.6% +115.5%
Annualized edge QQQM +15.0% +17.9%
Price return edge QQQM +89.2% +109.0%
Risk
Volatility edge CGGR (slight) 20.4% 21.5%
Max drawdown edge Tie −27.7% −27.6%
Downside capture 115.9% 99.8%
Beta 1.20 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM 0.58 0.68
Sortino edge QQQM 0.88 1.05
Treynor 0.098 0.147
Calmar edge QQQM 0.54 0.65
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 0.62
Information ratio 0.18 0.10
Tracking error 6.7% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +115.5% to +91.6%. CGGR swung slightly less: 20.4% to 21.5%. CGGR and QQQM fell about the same at their worst: −27.7% and −27.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+115.5%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+17.9%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+109.0%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%21.5%CGGR (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%13.9%CGGR (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−27.6%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.201.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.68QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.881.05QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.65QQQMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.370.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.180.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

43%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and QQQM hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

43% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 8.17%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57% 4.50%
Tesla Inc 4.19% 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21% 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38% 2.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.06% 2.72%
Broadcom Inc 4.69% 2.53%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48% 4.25%
Apple Inc 2.29% 7.88%
Intel Corp 1.08% 2.12%
Netflix Inc 0.97% 1.12%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Visa Inc 3.33%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Cloudflare Inc 2.37%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11%
TransDigm Group Inc 1.85%
Welltower Inc 1.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.39%
General Electric Co 1.05%
Only in QQQM
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.96%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.41%
Lam Research Corp 1.29%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.21%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.18%
Linde PLC 1.01%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 95.7%
Holdings 96 105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.9bn $110.4bn

CGGR and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2FE483CBE9

CGGR and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 43% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.