DGRW vs QUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
DGRW and QUS hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and QUS returned +15.2% over the year. Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $1.6bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF.
QUS costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; DGRW is 10.9 times larger.
| DGRW | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $16.6bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +15.2% |
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index ? |
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 23.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and QUS hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
45% in common
On the same fields
DGRW and QUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About QUS
QUS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 514 positions, with the top ten at 23.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or QUS?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.9% and QUS +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or QUS?
- QUS is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against QUS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qus
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DGRW against QUS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qus
[DGRW against QUS (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qus)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.