DGRW vs LRGC: Differences, Returns & Fees
DGRW and LRGC hold 46% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $1.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF.
DGRW costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.
| DGRW | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 and LRGC as of Oct 8, 2026 | $16.6bn | $1.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +13.4% |
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 46% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 45.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and LRGC hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
46% in common
On the same fields
DGRW and LRGC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About LRGC
LRGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 45.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or LRGC?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.9% and LRGC +13.4%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or LRGC?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against LRGC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-lrgc
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DGRW against LRGC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-lrgc
[DGRW against LRGC (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-lrgc)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.