Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DFUV vs IUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFUV returned +27.8% to IUS's +25.9%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DFUV and IUS
Net assets: $15.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF, and $1.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF.
Pair scorecard
IUS costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points.
| Measure | DFUV | IUS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +27.8% | +25.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Invesco Strategic US Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.19% |
| Net assets, DFUV as of Jul 31, 2026 and IUS as of Oct 27, 2026 | $15.4bn | $1.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.9% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
May 20, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 231 weekly returns · each against IWVIUS returned more: +105.6% to +82.0%. IUS swung slightly less: 14.3% to 15.6%. IUS fell slightly less at its worst: −15.5% to −16.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DFUV | IUS | IWV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +82.0% | +105.6% | IUS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +14.4% | +17.6% | IUS | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +68.6% | +90.9% | IUS | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 15.6% | 14.3% | IUS (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 11.0% | 9.6% | IUS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −16.0% | −15.5% | IUS (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 69.5% | 77.5% | 100.0% | IUS | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 82.3% | 83.4% | 100.0% | Tie | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.84 | 1.00 | Tie | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.74 | 0.91 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.90 | IUS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 0.94 | 1.34 | IUS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.125 | 0.153 | 0.128 | IUS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.90 | 1.14 | IUS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | IWV | IWV | IWV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.2% a year | +2.1% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.06 | 1.07 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −7.7% to +7.2% | −1.8% to +6.1% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.29 | 0.02 | IUS | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 8.4% | 5.0% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 231 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DFUV and IUS hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
45% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DFUV and IUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUV and IUS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. DFUV follows No index, actively managed and IUS follows Invesco Strategic US Index.
- Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DFUV returned +27.8% and IUS +25.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
DFUV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,332 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IUS tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 536 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUV or IUS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUV returned +27.8% and IUS +25.9%.
- Which is cheaper, DFUV or IUS?
- IUS is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFUV against IUS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-ius
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DFUV against IUS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-ius
[DFUV against IUS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-ius)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.