Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DFUS vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFUS returned +13.8% to MTUM's +18.4%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DFUS and MTUM

Net assets: $20.9bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+13.8%
DFUS total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.09%
DFUS expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DFUS costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.

DFUS vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDFUSMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026$20.9bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.6%35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 278 weekly returns
DFUS MTUM
Return
Total return edge DFUS +87.6% +78.0%
Annualized edge DFUS (slight) +12.5% +11.4%
Price return edge DFUS +76.2% +67.7%
Risk
Volatility edge DFUS 16.2% 20.3%
Max drawdown edge DFUS −24.2% −31.9%
Downside capture 99.4% 101.7%
Beta 1.00 1.02
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DFUS 0.58 0.45
Sortino edge DFUS 0.87 0.67
Treynor 0.094 0.135
Calmar edge DFUS 0.52 0.36
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.33 0.53
Information ratio 1.04 0.17
Tracking error 0.8% 9.3%

Each against its own benchmark: DFUS against IWV, Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

DFUS returned more: +87.6% to +78.0%. DFUS swung less: 16.2% to 20.3%. DFUS fell less at its worst: −24.2% to −31.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DFUS vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDFUSMTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+87.6%+78.0%DFUSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.5%+11.4%DFUS (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+76.2%+67.7%DFUSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%20.3%DFUSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.8%13.6%DFUSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.2%−31.9%DFUSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture101.4%106.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.4%101.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.02Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.76Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.45DFUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.67DFUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0940.135Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.520.36DFUSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+1.3% a yearMTUM not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.330.53Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+0.1% to +1.5%−3.7% to +6.3%MTUM includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio1.040.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.8%9.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 278 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

24%

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and MTUM hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

24% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DFUS MTUM
ALPHABET INC. 3.00% 2.62%
ALPHABET INC. 2.48% 2.07%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.35% 5.00%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 1.12% 6.06%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0.94% 2.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.90% 3.45%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 0.67% 3.64%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.62% 3.92%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 0.55% 2.22%
CATERPILLAR INC. 0.54% 1.92%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 0.53% 1.89%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 0.53% 1.65%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DFUS
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.75%
APPLE INC. 6.45%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.99%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.83%
BROADCOM INC. 2.63%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.77%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.38%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.37%
Only in MTUM
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 1.84%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.43%
WELLTOWER 0.96%
EQUINIX REIT 0.51%
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.47%
WW GRAINGER INC 0.35%
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIE 0.28%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +13.8% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +0.5 pts vs IWV +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 89.4% 93.2%
Holdings 2236 126
Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $20.9bn $18.7bn

DFUS and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-051CDB56DA

DFUS and MTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. DFUS follows No index, actively managed and MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DFUS returned +13.8% and MTUM +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DFUS

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

DFUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,236 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +13.8% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or MTUM?
DFUS is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 89% of DFUS and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFUS against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfus-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.