Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to PABU's +8.2%; 14% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and PABU

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $2.5bn for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+8.2%
PABU total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.10%
PABU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PABU costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.2 points; MTUM is 7.5 times larger.

MTUM vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMPABU
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+8.2%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexMSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$2.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common14%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%49.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 234 weekly returns
MTUM PABU
Return
Total return edge MTUM +107.6% +81.9%
Annualized edge MTUM +17.6% +14.2%
Price return edge MTUM +97.0% +73.3%
Risk
Volatility edge PABU 20.2% 17.7%
Max drawdown edge PABU (slight) −20.4% −19.0%
Downside capture 101.7% 107.3%
Beta 1.02 1.07
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MTUM 0.69 0.60
Sortino edge MTUM 1.05 0.91
Treynor 0.135 0.099
Calmar edge MTUM 0.86 0.75
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year −2.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 −1.42
Information ratio 0.17 −0.41
Tracking error 9.3% 3.5%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; PABU against PBUS, Apr 29, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned more: +107.6% to +81.9%. PABU swung less: 17.7% to 20.2%. PABU fell slightly less at its worst: −19.0% to −20.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMPABUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.6%+81.9%MTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.6%+14.2%MTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+97.0%+73.3%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.2%17.7%PABUSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.3%11.6%PABULike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−20.4%−19.0%PABU (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%108.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%107.3%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.021.07Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.96Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.690.60MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.050.91MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.099Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.860.75MTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGPBUSThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year−2.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.53−1.42Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−5.4% to +0.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.17−0.41Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%3.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 234 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

14%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and PABU hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

14% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM PABU
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 3.88%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 3.54%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.02% 2.89%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 1.60%
ANALOG DEVICES 0.96% 1.02%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.43% 0.81%
EQUINIX REIT 0.51% 1.93%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88% 0.44%
ASTERA LABS 0.39% 1.08%
KLA 1.04% 0.38%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.83% 0.26%
ROYALTY PHARMA PLC CLASS A 0.23% 0.75%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53%
SANDISK 2.42%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 2.22%
Only in PABU
NVIDIA 9.30%
MICROSOFT 7.93%
APPLE 7.66%
TESLA INC 3.58%
ELI LILLY 3.53%
BROADCOM INC 3.31%
SNOWFLAKE 3.28%
SERVICENOW 3.08%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +8.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +13.3% (PBUS)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG −5.1 pts vs PBUS
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 93.1%
Holdings 126 88
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $18.7bn $2.5bn

MTUM and PABU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0DCF1BF2A4

MTUM and PABU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 14% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and PABU +8.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and PABU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PABU

PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 49.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or PABU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and PABU +8.2%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or PABU?
PABU is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and PABU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 93% of PABU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against PABU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-pabu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.