DDWM vs EFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
DDWM and EFA hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned +13.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund, and $76.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.
EFA costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; EFA is far larger, $77.2bn against $1.4bn.
| DDWM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.32% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.4bn | $77.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.0% | +13.8% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | MSCI EAFE Index |
| Holdings in common | 58% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.2% | 14.2% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 5.0%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DDWM and EFA hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
58% in common
On the same fields
DDWM and EFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDWM in plain words
DDWM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,461 positions, with the top ten at 11.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
EFA in plain words
EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 659 positions, with the top ten at 14.2%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DDWM or EFA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DDWM returned +12.0% and EFA +13.8%.
- Which is cheaper, DDWM or EFA?
- EFA is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DDWM against EFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ddwm-vs-efa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DDWM against EFA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ddwm-vs-efa
[DDWM against EFA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ddwm-vs-efa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.