Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CSM vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CSM returned +14.4% to GLD's +2.8%, and GLD charges 0.40% to CSM's 0.45%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSM and GLD

Net assets: $521m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Large Cap Core Plus, and $131.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares.

At a glance
+14.4%
CSM total return, 1 year
+2.8%
GLD total return, 1 year
0.45%
CSM expense ratio
0.40%
GLD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; GLD is far larger, $135.0bn against $521m.

CSM vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCSMGLD
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.4%+2.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its high24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedGold
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash10.1 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.45%0.40%
Net assets$521m$135.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.98
Beta to the S&P 500+0.94: about 0.94% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.97%
Down-week capture90.7%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

CSM ProShares Large Cap Core Plus GLD SPDR Gold Shares
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Long-short equity Holds gold
Total return, 1 year +14.4% +2.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (IVV) +2.9% (IAU)
Gap to its benchmark −0.4 pts vs IVV −0.1 pts vs IAU
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.40%
Net assets, CSM as of Nov 4, 2026 and GLD as of Nov 3, 2026 $521m $131.3bn

CSM and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

CSM and GLD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CSM

CSM is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.98 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.94, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.94% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks CSM fell 0.97% on average, a down-week capture of 90.7%. Over the same 52 weeks CSM returned +13.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are CSM and GLD in the same category?
CSM is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CSM or GLD?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CSM returned +14.4% and GLD +2.8%.
Which is cheaper, CSM or GLD?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSM against GLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/csm-vs-gld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.