Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CPRO vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CPRO returned +7.2% to IWM's +14.1%, and IWM charges 0.19% to CPRO's 0.69%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CPRO and IWM

Net assets: $27m on Oct 28, 2026 for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October, and $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+7.2%
CPRO total return, 1 year
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
0.69%
CPRO expense ratio
0.19%
IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $27m.

CPRO vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCPROIWM
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer0.8%
Fund price fall to the buffer0.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksIWMRussell 2000 Index
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points100.0% of 100.0%
Days left in the period337
Period endsSep 30, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$27m$75.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Method

Side by side

CPRO Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 100% on IWM Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +7.2% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.0% (IWM) +14.3% (VTWO)
Gap to its benchmark −5.8 pts vs IWM −0.2 pts vs VTWO
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.19%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 1977
Net assets, CPRO as of Oct 28, 2026 and IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 $27m $75.5bn

CPRO and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CPRO

The fund's price can fall 0.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 0.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 337 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are CPRO and IWM in the same category?
CPRO is a buffer ETF and IWM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CPRO or IWM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CPRO returned +7.2% and IWM +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, CPRO or IWM?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CPRO against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cpro-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.