Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs SNOV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to SNOV's +9.6%, and IWM charges 0.19% to SNOV's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and SNOV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $113m for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+9.6%
SNOV total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.90%
SNOV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.71 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $113m.

IWM vs SNOV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMSNOV
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+9.6%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer16.2%
Fund price fall to the buffer14.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexIWM
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period23
Period endsNov 20, 2026
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.90%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$113m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Method

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Defined outcome, 15% on IWM
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +9.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) +13.0% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO −3.4 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.90%
Holdings 1977 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $113m

IWM and SNOV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM and SNOV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SNOV

IWM had already risen past this fund's cap of +18.4% for the period on Oct 28, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.6% as the period runs out.

The fund's price can fall 14.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 16.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 23 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Nov 20, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are IWM and SNOV in the same category?
IWM is a stock ETF and SNOV is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SNOV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and SNOV +9.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or SNOV?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.71 percentage points a year. That is about $71 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against SNOV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-snov

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.