Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SNOV vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SNOV returned +9.6% to VTWO's +14.3%, and VTWO charges 0.06% to SNOV's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SNOV and VTWO

Net assets: $113m on Oct 27, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+9.6%
SNOV total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.90%
SNOV expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.84 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points.

SNOV vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSNOVVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.6%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer16.2%
Fund price fall to the buffer14.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksIWMRussell 2000 Index
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period23
Period endsNov 20, 2026
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.90%0.06%
Net assets, SNOV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$113m$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Method

Side by side

SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 15% on IWM Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +9.6% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.0% (IWM) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs IWM +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.90% 0.06%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 2002
Net assets, SNOV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $113m $16.6bn

SNOV and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SNOV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SNOV

IWM had already risen past this fund's cap of +18.4% for the period on Oct 28, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.6% as the period runs out.

The fund's price can fall 14.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 16.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 23 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Nov 20, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are SNOV and VTWO in the same category?
SNOV is a buffer ETF and VTWO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, SNOV or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SNOV returned +9.6% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, SNOV or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.84 percentage points a year. That is about $84 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SNOV against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/snov-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.