Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs SFEB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to SFEB's +12.0%, and IWM charges 0.19% to SFEB's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and SFEB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $129m for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+12.0%
SFEB total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.90%
SFEB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.71 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $129m.

IWM vs SFEB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMSFEB
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+12.0%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer5.9%
Fund price fall to the buffer6.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexIWM
The outcome period
Room to the cap10.0%
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period114
Period endsFeb 19, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.90%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$129m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Method

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF SFEB FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Defined outcome, 15% on IWM
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +12.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) +13.0% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO −1.0 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.90%
Holdings 1977 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $129m

IWM and SFEB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM and SFEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SFEB

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 6.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 5.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 114 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are IWM and SFEB in the same category?
IWM is a stock ETF and SFEB is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SFEB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and SFEB +12.0%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or SFEB?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.71 percentage points a year. That is about $71 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against SFEB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-sfeb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.