Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CPRO vs IJR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CPRO returned +7.2% to IJR's +17.5%, and IJR charges 0.06% to CPRO's 0.69%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CPRO and IJR

Net assets: $27m on Oct 28, 2026 for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October, and $104.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+7.2%
CPRO total return, 1 year
+17.5%
IJR total return, 1 year
0.69%
CPRO expense ratio
0.06%
IJR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJR costs 0.63 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points; IJR is far larger, $104.6bn against $27m.

CPRO vs IJR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCPROIJR
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.5%
Drawdown
Below its high6.8%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer0.8%
Fund price fall to the buffer0.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksIWMS&P SmallCap 600
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points100.0% of 100.0%
Days left in the period337
Period endsSep 30, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.06%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$27m$104.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.3%

Method

Side by side

CPRO Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 100% on IWM Tracks the S&P SmallCap 600
Total return, 1 year +7.2% +17.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.0% (IWM) +17.6% (SPSM)
Gap to its benchmark −5.8 pts vs IWM −0.1 pts vs SPSM
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.06%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 642
Net assets, CPRO as of Oct 28, 2026 and IJR as of Oct 27, 2026 $27m $104.6bn

CPRO and IJR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CPRO

The fund's price can fall 0.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 0.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 337 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

IJR

IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 642 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are CPRO and IJR in the same category?
CPRO is a buffer ETF and IJR is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CPRO or IJR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CPRO returned +7.2% and IJR +17.5%.
Which is cheaper, CPRO or IJR?
IJR is cheaper, by 0.63 percentage points a year. That is about $63 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CPRO against IJR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cpro-vs-ijr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.