CGNG vs SCHE: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGNG and SCHE hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and CGNG returned +17.9% over the year. Net assets: $3.2bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF, and $12.7bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF.
SCHE costs 0.58 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points; SCHE is 5.4 times larger.
| CGNG | SCHE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $2.4bn | $12.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +12.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Emerging Index |
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.8% | 30.3% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGNG and SCHE hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
15% in common
On the same fields
CGNG and SCHE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGNG in plain words
CGNG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.64% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 14% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 239 positions, with the top ten at 32.8%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SCHE in plain words
SCHE tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,178 positions, with the top ten at 30.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGNG or SCHE?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGNG returned +17.9% and SCHE +12.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGNG or SCHE?
- SCHE is cheaper, by 0.58 percentage points a year. That is about $58 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGNG against SCHE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-sche
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGNG against SCHE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-sche
[CGNG against SCHE (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-sche)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.