CGMM vs VFMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGMM and VFMO hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and VFMO returned +13.2% over the year. Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF, and $1.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF.
VFMO costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; CGMM is 1.8 times larger.
| CGMM | VFMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.51% | 0.13% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.4bn | $1.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.1% | +13.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 18.7% | 9.5% |
| Below its high | 6.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 11.5%, high on Jun 30, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
CGMM and VFMO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 7% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 CGMM returned +11.1% and VFMO +13.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.
- Number of holdings. CGMM holds 114 positions and VFMO holds 704.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGMM and VFMO hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
7% in common
On the same fields
CGMM and VFMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGMM
CGMM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.51% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 45% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 18.7%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About VFMO
VFMO is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 704 positions, with the top ten at 9.5%. It sat 11.5% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGMM or VFMO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGMM returned +11.1% and VFMO +13.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGMM or VFMO?
- VFMO is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGMM against VFMO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-vfmo
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGMM against VFMO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-vfmo
[CGMM against VFMO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-vfmo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.