Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs XLK: how they differ
CGGR and XLK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGGR | Only in XLK |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | NVIDIA CORP 14.31% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | APPLE INC 12.98% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | MICROSOFT CORP 9.90% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | BROADCOM INC 4.62% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.23% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.11% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | INTEL CORP 3.27% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital Group | State Street |
| What it is | Growth | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 74 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or XLK?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources