Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SPMO vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SPMO returned +18.4% to XLK's +27.1%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SPMO and XLK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $22.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points; XLK is 5.6 times larger.

SPMO vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSPMOXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high10.2%, high on Jun 22, 20265.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Momentum IndexTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.13%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$22.3bn$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common39%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50.7%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 574 weekly returns
SPMO XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +519.8% +843.9%
Annualized edge XLK +18.0% +22.6%
Price return edge XLK +442.9% +736.1%
Risk
Volatility edge SPMO 19.0% 22.0%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −28.3% −32.6%
Downside capture 93.8% 113.0%
Beta 0.98 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK (slight) 0.84 0.93
Sortino edge XLK (slight) 1.27 1.41
Treynor 0.164 0.094
Calmar edge XLK (slight) 0.63 0.69
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.8% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.28 0.67
Information ratio 0.36 0.22
Tracking error 9.7% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLK returned more: +843.9% to +519.8%. SPMO swung less: 19.0% to 22.0%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −32.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SPMO vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSPMOXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+519.8%+843.9%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.0%+22.6%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+442.9%+736.1%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%22.0%SPMOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%14.6%SPMOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−28.3%−32.6%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.9%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture93.8%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.981.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.840.93XLK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.271.41XLK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1640.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.69XLK (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.8% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.280.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.0% to +9.5%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.360.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.7%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 574 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

39%

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and XLK hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

39% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SPMO XLK
Apple Inc 9.95% 14.62%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.48% 4.78%
Micron Technology Inc 8.80% 4.02%
Intel Corp 4.60% 2.72%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.53% 2.56%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.86% 1.91%
Applied Materials Inc 2.28% 1.84%
Lam Research Corp 2.33% 1.76%
Sandisk Corp 2.20% 1.11%
Analog Devices Inc 1.04% 1.21%
Marvell Technology Inc 1.02% 1.25%
KLA Corp 1.00% 1.17%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SPMO
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Alphabet Inc 3.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Merck & Co Inc 2.22%
Caterpillar Inc 1.88%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.83%
Coca-Cola Co 1.70%
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
MICROSOFT CORP 11.38%
BROADCOM INC 4.70%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 1.65%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A 1.59%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.38%
ORACLE CORP 1.32%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +4.7 pts vs VOO +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.13% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 100.0% 99.9%
Holdings 101 76
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.3bn $125.0bn

SPMO and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C47EFF2DDB

SPMO and XLK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 39% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SPMO returned +18.4% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPMO and XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +18.4% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SPMO against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.