Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

XLG vs XLK: how they differ

XLG and XLK hold 50% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLG and XLK hold 50% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLG and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLGXLK
NVIDIA Corp12.79%14.31%
Apple Inc11.58%12.98%
Microsoft Corp8.83%9.90%
Broadcom Inc4.12%4.62%
Micron Technology Inc2.66%4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.99%4.23%
Intel Corp1.20%3.27%
Cisco Systems Inc1.02%2.80%
Palantir Technologies Inc0.92%2.52%
Lam Research Corp0.90%2.46%
Applied Materials Inc0.87%2.38%
Oracle Corp0.63%1.72%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in XLGOnly in XLK
Amazon.com Inc 5.95%PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 1.81%
Alphabet Inc 4.71%CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A 1.41%
Alphabet Inc 3.77%MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 1.31%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.42%SALESFORCE INC 1.31%
Tesla Inc 2.47%AMPHENOL CORP CL A 1.30%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.29%ARISTA NETWORKS INC 1.29%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.25%SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS 1.28%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.15%ANALOG DEVICES INC 1.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

XLG and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 top 50Technology
Total return, 1 year+12.2%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.3 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings5274

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, XLG or XLK?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, XLG returned +12.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, XLG or XLK?
XLG charges 0.20% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do XLG and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of XLG and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 50% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLG against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLG against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/xlg-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources