Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to FTEC's +25.0%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and FTEC

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.4 points; CGGR is 1.2 times larger.

CGGR vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRFTEC
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+25.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20264.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.1bn$22.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%62.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR FTEC
Return
Total return edge FTEC +91.6% +154.1%
Annualized edge FTEC +15.0% +22.2%
Price return edge FTEC +89.2% +146.4%
Risk
Volatility edge CGGR 20.4% 24.7%
Max drawdown edge Tie −27.7% −27.2%
Downside capture 115.9% 100.0%
Beta 1.20 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.58 0.76
Sortino edge FTEC 0.88 1.19
Treynor 0.098 0.199
Calmar edge FTEC 0.54 0.82
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 −0.70
Information ratio 0.18 −0.19
Tracking error 6.7% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +154.1% to +91.6%. CGGR swung less: 20.4% to 24.7%. CGGR and FTEC fell about the same at their worst: −27.7% and −27.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRFTECEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+154.1%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+22.2%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+146.4%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%24.7%CGGRSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%15.9%CGGRLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−27.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%99.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.201.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.76FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.881.19FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.199Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.82FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOVGTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.37−0.70Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−0.5% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.18−0.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

27%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FTEC hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR FTEC
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 17.09%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 10.93%
Broadcom Inc 4.69% 4.20%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57% 3.82%
Apple Inc 2.29% 16.21%
Intel Corp 1.08% 1.65%
KLA Corp 0.89% 1.02%
Amphenol Corp 0.94% 0.85%
Salesforce Inc 0.65% 0.65%
Arista Networks Inc 0.45% 0.84%
Applied Materials Inc 0.43% 1.69%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.43% 1.92%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Alphabet Inc 3.06%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11%
Only in FTEC
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18%
Lam Research Corp 1.54%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
Oracle Corp 0.90%
International Business Machines Corp 0.88%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +24.7% (VGT)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO +0.3 pts vs VGT
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 87.8%
Holdings 96 281
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 $25.9bn $22.1bn

CGGR and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AB534B62DB

CGGR and FTEC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and FTEC +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 22.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FTEC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and FTEC +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or FTEC?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 88% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against FTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-ftec

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.