Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs TCAF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to TCAF's +12.5%; 37% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and TCAF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $8.1bn for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
TCAF costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points; CGGR is 3.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | TCAF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +12.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.31% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $8.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 37% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 40.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and TCAF hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
37% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and TCAF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and TCAF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 37% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and TCAF +12.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.9 points.
- Size. CGGR has $25.9bn in net assets and TCAF $8.1bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); CGGR is 3.2 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
TCAF is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 90 positions, with the top ten at 40.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or TCAF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and TCAF +12.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or TCAF?
- TCAF is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against TCAF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tcaf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against TCAF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tcaf
[CGGR against TCAF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tcaf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.