Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and MINT

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MINT costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points.

CGGR vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.36%
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$25.9bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight78%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +4.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.36%
Holdings 96 977
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $25.9bn $16.4bn

CGGR and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or MINT?
MINT is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.