Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MINT vs RDVY: how they differ

MINT and RDVY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and RDVY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MINTOnly in RDVY
United States Treasury 6.51%Lam Research Corporation 3.09%
Fannie Mae 1.18%Applied Materials, Inc. 2.99%
Freddie Mac 1.04%KLA Corporation 2.47%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.46%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.26%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%GE Vernova Inc. 2.24%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%Bank of America Corporation 2.18%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%Ross Stores, Inc. 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

MINT and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPIMCOFirst Trust
What it isEnhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-TradFirst Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year+4.4%+22.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−13.1 pts+4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.47%
Already in the S&P 5009.7%94.4%
Holdings97772

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 24.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or RDVY?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MINT or RDVY?
MINT charges 0.36% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so MINT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MINT and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MINT against RDVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against RDVY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-rdvy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources