Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and SHV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $21.7bn for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHV costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; CGGR is 1.2 times larger.

CGGR vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$21.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight78%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.15%
Holdings 96 66
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.9bn $21.7bn

CGGR and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SHV?
SHV is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.