Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs LRGC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to LRGC's +10.2%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and LRGC
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $1.3bn on Aug 31, 2026 for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.39% a year; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points; CGGR is 18.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CGGR | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +10.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $25.6bn | $1.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 44.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and LRGC hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
38% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and LRGC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and LRGC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and LRGC +10.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.6 points.
- Size. CGGR has $25.6bn in net assets and LRGC $1.4bn (net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026); CGGR is 18.3 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
LRGC
LRGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 44.0%.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against LRGC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-lrgc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against LRGC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-lrgc
[CGGR against LRGC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-lrgc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.