Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs TDVG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to TDVG's +14.2%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and TDVG
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $1.3bn for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGGR costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; CGGR is 19.9 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | TDVG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +14.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 29.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and TDVG hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and TDVG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and TDVG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and TDVG +14.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.6 points.
- Cost. CGGR charges 0.39% of assets a year and TDVG 0.50%, a gap of 0.11 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
TDVG is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or TDVG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and TDVG +14.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or TDVG?
- CGGR is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against TDVG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tdvg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against TDVG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tdvg
[CGGR against TDVG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tdvg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.