CGGR vs JTEK: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGGR and JTEK hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and JTEK returned +6.6% over the year. Net assets: $26.0bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $4.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF.
CGGR costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; CGGR is 5.8 times larger.
| CGGR | JTEK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $26.0bn | $4.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.8% | +6.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 44.2% | 34.5% |
| Below its high | 11.1%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and JTEK hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
half
30% in common
On the same fields
CGGR and JTEK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
About JTEK
JTEK is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 34.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or JTEK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +5.8% and JTEK +6.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or JTEK?
- CGGR is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against JTEK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-jtek
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGGR against JTEK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-jtek
[CGGR against JTEK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-jtek)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.