JTEK vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees
JTEK and PABU hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and PABU returned +10.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $4.5bn for JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF and $2.5bn for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF.
PABU costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points; JTEK is 1.8 times larger.
| JTEK | PABU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.10% |
| Net assets | $4.5bn | $2.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +10.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index |
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 34.5% | 48.9% |
| Below its high | 11.1%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
JTEK and PABU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. JTEK follows No index, actively managed and PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index.
- Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 20, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 JTEK returned +6.6% and PABU +10.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.6 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JTEK and PABU hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
half
33% in common
On the same fields
JTEK and PABU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JTEK
JTEK is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 34.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About PABU
PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JTEK or PABU?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JTEK returned +6.6% and PABU +10.2%.
- Which is cheaper, JTEK or PABU?
- PABU is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JTEK against PABU, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jtek-vs-pabu
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). JTEK against PABU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jtek-vs-pabu
[JTEK against PABU (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jtek-vs-pabu)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.