Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to VHT's +25.0%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and VHT
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.
Pair scorecard
VHT costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.2 points; CGDV is 2.0 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +25.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $38.4bn | $19.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 51.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and VHT hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
8% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and VHT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and VHT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50.
- Holdings in common. 8% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and VHT +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VHT
VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or VHT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and VHT +25.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or VHT?
- VHT is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vht
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against VHT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vht
[CGDV against VHT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vht)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.