Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to XLI's +10.2%; 12% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and XLI

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $30.8bn for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+10.2%
XLI total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.08%
XLI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLI costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.6 points; CGDV is 1.3 times larger.

CGDV vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVXLI
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+10.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 20269.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedIndustrial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$39.1bn$30.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common12%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%37.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV XLI
Return
Total return edge CGDV +107.2% +76.0%
Annualized edge CGDV +16.9% +12.9%
Price return edge CGDV +93.0% +64.0%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV 14.8% 17.4%
Max drawdown edge XLI (slight) −21.1% −19.4%
Downside capture 88.1% 102.2%
Beta 0.93 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.54
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 0.82
Treynor 0.134 0.087
Calmar edge CGDV 0.80 0.67
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.35
Information ratio 0.68 0.10
Tracking error 5.6% 9.4%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; XLI against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGDV returned more: +107.2% to +76.0%. CGDV swung less: 14.8% to 17.4%. XLI fell slightly less at its worst: −19.4% to −21.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVXLIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+76.0%CGDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+12.9%CGDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+64.0%CGDVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%17.4%CGDVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%11.6%CGDVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−19.4%XLI (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%105.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%102.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.79Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.54CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.280.82CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.087Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.67CGDVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.35Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−2.9% to +4.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.680.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%9.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

12%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLI hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

12% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV XLI
RTX Corp 3.16% 4.91%
General Electric Co 3.05% 5.79%
Union Pacific Corp 2.35% 3.34%
Uber Technologies Inc 1.13% 2.52%
General Dynamics Corp 0.94% 1.69%
Carrier Global Corp 2.36% 0.89%
Illinois Tool Works Inc 0.88% 1.34%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Microsoft Corp 7.64%
NVIDIA Corp 6.32%
Broadcom Inc 4.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
Comcast Corp 2.61%
Only in XLI
CATERPILLAR INC 6.14%
GE VERNOVA INC 4.47%
DEERE + CO 3.01%
EATON CORP PLC 2.79%
BOEING CO 2.49%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 2.37%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 2.18%
PARKER HANNIFIN CORP 2.13%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF XLI State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Industrials
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +10.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD −3.4 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 99.9%
Holdings 53 84
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $39.1bn $30.8bn

CGDV and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-D9043415C2

CGDV and XLI do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and XLI follows Industrial Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 12% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and XLI +10.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLI

XLI tracks an index of Industrials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 84 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%. It sat 9.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and XLI +10.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLI?
XLI is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against XLI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xli

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.