Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWD vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWD returned +27.5% to VHT's +25.0%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWD and VHT
Net assets: $83.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.
Pair scorecard
VHT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; IWD is 4.2 times larger.
| Measure | IWD | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +27.5% | +25.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Value Index | MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $81.0bn | $19.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.6% | 51.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IWD against VONV, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VHT against FHLC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.
VHT returned more: +797.6% to +618.6%. VHT swung slightly less: 16.4% to 17.9%. VHT fell less at its worst: −38.1% to −59.8%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWD | VHT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +618.6% | +797.6% | VHT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.0% | +10.1% | VHT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +330.7% | +552.3% | VHT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.9% | 16.4% | VHT (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.8% | 11.6% | VHT (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −59.8% | −38.1% | VHT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 100.0% | 100.7% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 100.2% | 100.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.47 | 0.56 | VHT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.66 | 0.79 | VHT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.110 | 0.103 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.15 | 0.27 | VHT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | VONV | FHLC | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.1% a year | 0.0% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.23 | 0.17 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.6% to +0.5% | −0.4% to +0.5% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.08 | 0.15 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.1% | 0.8% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VHT hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
13% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWD and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD and VHT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWD follows Russell 1000 Value Index and VHT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50.
- Holdings in common. 13% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWD returned +27.5% and VHT +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWD
IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.
VHT
VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VHT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.5% and VHT +25.0%.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or VHT?
- VHT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWD against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-vht
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWD against VHT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-vht
[IWD against VHT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-vht)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.