Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs JVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to JVAL's +24.0%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and JVAL
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $1.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
JVAL costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; CGDV is far larger, $39.1bn against $1.1bn.
| Measure | CGDV | JVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +24.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | JP Morgan US Value Factor Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.12% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 17.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and JVAL hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.
half
18% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and JVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and JVAL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and JVAL follows JP Morgan US Value Factor Index.
- Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and JVAL +24.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
JVAL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026, 71% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 17.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or JVAL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and JVAL +24.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or JVAL?
- JVAL is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against JVAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-jval
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against JVAL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-jval
[CGDV against JVAL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-jval)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.