Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs TVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to TVAL's +28.0%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and TVAL
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $1.1bn for T. Rowe Price Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.33% a year; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points; CGDV is far larger, $39.1bn against $1.1bn.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CGDV | TVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +28.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 23.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and TVAL hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and TVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and TVAL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and TVAL +28.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.2 points.
- Size. CGDV has $39.1bn in net assets and TVAL $1.1bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); CGDV is 35.5 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +28.0% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
TVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 158 positions, with the top ten at 23.0%.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against TVAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-tval
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against TVAL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-tval
[CGDV against TVAL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-tval)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.