CGCV vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGCV and SPMO hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned +25.1% over the year. Net assets: $2.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF, and $23.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
SPMO costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; SPMO is 11.0 times larger.
| CGCV | SPMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.13% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $2.1bn | $23.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.6% | +25.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Holdings dated | May 31, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.3% | 50.9% |
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGCV and SPMO hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
CGCV and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGCV
CGCV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 32.3%.
About SPMO
SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.9%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCV or SPMO?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCV returned +10.6% and SPMO +25.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCV or SPMO?
- SPMO is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCV against SPMO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-spmo
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGCV against SPMO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-spmo
[CGCV against SPMO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-spmo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.