QDF vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
QDF and SPMO hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned +25.1% over the year. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF, and $23.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
SPMO costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points.
| QDF | SPMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.13% |
| Net assets, QDF as of Jul 31, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 9, 2026 | $2.2bn | $23.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +25.1% |
| What it tracks | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Holdings dated | Jul 31, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.4% | 50.9% |
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDF and SPMO hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
27% in common
On the same fields
QDF and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About QDF
QDF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 39.4%.
About SPMO
SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.9%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QDF or SPMO?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QDF returned +17.4% and SPMO +25.1%.
- Which is cheaper, QDF or SPMO?
- SPMO is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QDF against SPMO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdf-vs-spmo
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). QDF against SPMO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdf-vs-spmo
[QDF against SPMO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdf-vs-spmo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.