Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs XBI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to XBI's +41.2%, and CGBL charges 0.33% to XBI's 0.35%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and XBI
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.9bn for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and $10.3bn for State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGBL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.1 points; XBI is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | CGBL | XBI |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +41.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 8.9%, high on Feb 8, 2021 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Biotech |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.9bn | $10.3bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 18% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and XBI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XBI
By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +41.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 8.9% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Are CGBL and XBI in the same category?
- CGBL is an allocation ETF and XBI is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or XBI?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and XBI +41.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or XBI?
- CGBL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against XBI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-xbi
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against XBI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-xbi
[CGBL against XBI (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-xbi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.