Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs GRNY: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to GRNY's +6.5%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and GRNY
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGBL costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.
| Measure | CGBL | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +6.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, CGBL as of Oct 27, 2026 and GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 | $7.9bn | $4.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 26.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 101 weekly returnsGRNY returned more: +34.7% to +22.2%. CGBL swung less: 10.5% to 19.6%. CGBL fell less at its worst: −10.0% to −23.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGBL | GRNY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +22.2% | +34.7% | GRNY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +10.9% | +16.6% | GRNY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +17.4% | +34.5% | GRNY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.5% | 19.6% | CGBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 6.9% | 12.5% | CGBL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −10.0% | −23.1% | CGBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.68 | GRNY (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.99 | 1.05 | GRNY (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.09 | 0.72 | CGBL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 101 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and GRNY hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL and GRNY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- Cost. CGBL charges 0.33% of assets a year and GRNY 0.75%, a gap of 0.42 points.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
GRNY
GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or GRNY?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and GRNY +6.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or GRNY?
- CGBL is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against GRNY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-grny
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against GRNY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-grny
[CGBL against GRNY (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-grny)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.