Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GRNY vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GRNY returned +6.5% to XLB's +18.5%; 7% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GRNY and XLB

Net assets: $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF, and $8.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+6.5%
GRNY total return, 1 year
+18.5%
XLB total return, 1 year
0.75%
GRNY expense ratio
0.08%
XLB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLB costs 0.67 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.0 points.

GRNY vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGRNYXLB
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+18.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMaterials Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.08%
Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026$4.3bn$8.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common7%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%58.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

7%

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and XLB hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

7% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GRNY XLB
Packaging Corp of America 2.66% 3.42%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc 2.36% 4.84%
CF Industries Holdings Inc 2.36% 2.79%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GRNY
Arista Networks Inc 2.92%
General Electric Co 2.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.66%
PNC Financial Services Group I 2.63%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.61%
Robinhood Markets Inc 2.61%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 2.59%
Microsoft Corp 2.54%
Only in XLB
LINDE PLC 12.96%
NEWMONT CORP 6.56%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 5.23%
ECOLAB INC 4.98%
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 4.89%
NUCOR CORP 4.89%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC 4.77%
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 4.73%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Materials
Total return, 1 year +6.5% +18.5%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 98.0% 99.8%
Holdings 43 25
Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.3bn $8.1bn

GRNY and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GRNY

GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLB

XLB tracks an index of Materials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or XLB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +6.5% and XLB +18.5%.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or XLB?
XLB is cheaper, by 0.67 percentage points a year. That is about $67 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of GRNY and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GRNY against XLB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-xlb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.