Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AVUS vs CGBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVUS returned +18.0% to CGBL's +7.1%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AVUS and CGBL
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.8bn for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and $7.9bn for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF.
Pair scorecard
AVUS costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.9 points; AVUS is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | AVUS | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | +7.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $14.8bn | $7.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.0% | 59.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and CGBL hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AVUS and CGBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000.
AVUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,943 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or CGBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +18.0% and CGBL +7.1%.
- Which is cheaper, AVUS or CGBL?
- AVUS is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AVUS against CGBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avus-vs-cgbl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AVUS against CGBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avus-vs-cgbl
[AVUS against CGBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avus-vs-cgbl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.