Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GRNY vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GRNY returned +6.5% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GRNY and PDBC

Net assets: $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+6.5%
GRNY total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.75%
GRNY expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PDBC costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 49.1 points.

GRNY vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGRNYPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.59%
Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026$4.3bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GRNY PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GRNY
Arista Networks Inc 2.92%
General Electric Co 2.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.66%
Packaging Corp of America 2.66%
PNC Financial Services Group I 2.63%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.61%
Robinhood Markets Inc 2.61%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 2.59%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +6.5% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.59%
Holdings 43 1
Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.3bn $8.0bn

GRNY and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GRNY

GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +6.5% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or PDBC?
PDBC is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GRNY against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.