Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IWF?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IWF +0.9%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or IWF?

IWF is cheaper, by 4.50 percentage points a year. That is about $450 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and IWF an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +0.9%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and IWF

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

BWET on its own →IWF on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+0.9%

IWF total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.18%

IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWF costs 4.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5120.8 points; IWF is far larger, $123.5bn against $186m.

BWET vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	IWF
Return
Measure	BWET	IWF
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+0.9%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	IWF
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026	4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	IWF
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	Russell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	IWF
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026	$186m	$123.5bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	IWF
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		57.5%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Breakwave iShares

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks the Russell 1000 growth

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +0.9%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +1.1% (VONG)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VONG

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.18%

Holdings not counted 374

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $124.7bn

BWET and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IWF?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or IWF?: IWF is cheaper, by 4.50 percentage points a year. That is about $450 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs QQQM BWET vs VUG BWET vs SCHG BWET vs QQQ IWF vs USO IWF vs SIVR IWF vs SLV GLDM vs IWF

Where to next

BWET on its own →IWF on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IWF dividend history →IWF holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

IWF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IWF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IWF ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.